Manufacturers of Specialty Chemicals, Waste Water Treatment Chemicals, Cooling Water Treatment Chemicals, Boiler Water Treatment Chemicals, Fire Side Chemicals, Anionic, Nonionic and Cationic Polymers, Speciality Chemicals for Waste Water Treatment Process Manufacturers of Specialty Chemicals, Waste Water Treatment Chemicals, Cooling Water Treatment Chemicals, Boiler Water Treatment Chemicals, Fire Side Chemicals, Anionic, Nonionic and Cationic Polymers, Speciality Chemicals for Waste Water Treatment Process Manufacturers of Specialty Chemicals, Waste Water Treatment Chemicals, Cooling Water Treatment Chemicals, Boiler Water Treatment Chemicals, Fire Side Chemicals, Anionic, Nonionic and Cationic Polymers, Speciality Chemicals for Waste Water Treatment Process

Anionic, Nonionic and Cationic Polymers, SEDIFLOC, SEDIFLOC Anionic, Nonionic and Cationic Polymers, SURE FLOC, Sludge Treatments

  Product Range
   
         
         
     

PERCENTAGE OF SOLUTION – MAKE - UP

0.25-1.0% solution of cationic polymers.
0.1-0.5% solutions of nonionic and anionic polymers.

JAR TEST DOSAGE CALCULATIONS

Remember that :

0.1% solution is 1,000 ppm.
0.25% solution is 2,500 ppm.
0.5% solution is 5,000 ppm.
1.0% solution is 10,000 ppm.

And that:

b.
ppm dosage = (ppm polymer or inorg. sol.) x (ml sol. added) ( ml water sample dosed)

JAR TEST MIXING PROCEDURE

Flocculant: Rapid mix for 30 sec. at 80-100 rpm. Slow mix for 3 min. at 10-20 rpm.

TEST PROCEDURE AND WORK PLAN

Because of water quality variations and unknown factors influencing coagulation and flocculation, it is impossible to predict the types and amounts of reagents necessary to achieve the desired result economically. Therefore, trial and error experimentation via the jar test procedure must be carried out, preferably with fresh water samples at the job site.

DATA RECORDING

On the jar test data sheets record floc size, settling rate, and supernatant clarity on a scale of 1 to 10. The best is represented by 10. Untreated control samples are represented by 5. Good results as compared to the control are then graded 6-10. Results poorer than control are graded 1-4. No visible effect, as compared to the control, is graded as 5.

In some cases you may also be interested in the volume of sludge produced and how this volume may vary depending upon the treatment. This can easily be done using graduated jar test beakers after a given period of settling time. Record in "Comments" section.